Who should I vote for?
Labour -21 ![]() | |
![]() | |
Liberal Democrat -66 ![]() | |
![]() | |
Green -6 ![]() |
This rather neat diagram should tell you something. I particularly love the fuss at the moment about the postal voting fraud scam, especially those who try and portray the Tories as being the biggest scammers of them all, but hmmm??? a quick glance at the facts tells you that it was in fact a LABOUR councillor who got jailed for fixing over 20,000 votes! Nice try there, Whitehall spin machine.
Edit on tax: Obviously I strongly disagree with taxing rich people anymore than they already ridiculously are. Good old Labour, with its policy of "let's screw the rich people and just chuck it all over to the suburbs where the poor people are". This has 2 consequences:
1. The rich people have less money, therefore they won't exactly want to vote Labour will they? Because let's face it, everyone likes having money.
2. The poor people get the rich people's money for free, so they won't want to bloody work anyway because they're surviving on handouts made from other people's inheritances/hard work/acumen.
Edit on immigration: A personal favourite of mine. You've got to love how bleeding-heart liberal this country is. You can hear it now: "yes, we don't care what creed, colour or religion you are, you're welcome here." Even more amusing is when these immigrants can't drive yet buy one-step-away-from-scrapheap cars, and kill people. I wonder if I would receive such a warm welcome if I went to China or India, soaking up state benefits, making hardworking people's lives a misery. Fat fucking chance.
Edit on 'free care for the elderly': Nice election gimmick there Mr Kennedy. Unfortunately it's completely unworkable because the population as a whole is getting older, therefore over time more and more people will claim such care, placing higher levels of demand on the limited number of qualified carers who exist. Since their skills will be in higher demand they can afford to charge the state more, costing the government more.
Edit on transport: The Lib Dems can be utter twats when it comes to this. I wish they'd stop painting motorists as the devil. In my local borough they have plans to introduce 5 or 6 traffic lights along a half mile stretch, flogging it off to the public as a safety measure. Is it fuck - it's got one of the lowest accident rates in the whole town. So what are the consequences of even more traffic lights?
1. Even more congestion. This isn't rocket science. If you make cars stop more it will take them longer to complete a journey. DUH!
2. Even more pollution. This still isn't rocket science. Cars burn more fuel when starting from standstill as opposed to moving fluidly without stopping. This will probably placate all the tree-hugging bloody liberals who care about the environment no end.
Edit on crime: More liberalism, unfortunately. The government is presented with this problem: "Oh Mr Blair sir, we've got a problem, more people are being sent to prison and they're getting all full up. What are we going to do sir?" "Oh I know. Let's set up an early release scheme so they can go back to where they came from and terrorise their communities!" *Applause*
[2nd edit: At this time only the Conservative party are committed to building more prisons and sending 250,000 more people to jail] The Lib Dem stance isn't much better. "Prison isn't the answer", according to one of their white papers. Then, er, what is? Putting them all on pretty fast-track vocational schemes to give them more qualifications than people who worked harder and better? Oh hang on, you already did that number. Bloody idiots.
No comments:
Post a Comment